tuannie wrote: Jammy Straub wrote:
The samples from the 24mm f/1.4 are gorgeous, well done Nikon. Can the wedding photogs celebrate yet?
What\'s up with the 16-35VR samples, bleh?
Jammy, $2,200 is pretty steep for a 24 1.4...I seriously think the 24-70 is better I never missed a wedding shot with the zoom at 2.8
That\'s the rub isn\'t it, a standard zoom is so darn versatile and with ISO 6400 f/2.8 is often fast enough. Guess it really depends if you\'re a prime shooter or not, clients do tend to like the dreamy look f/1.4 and f/1.2 lenses have though. In the end its one less thing for people to complain about Nikon not offering
Feb 08, 2010 at 11:59 PM
Previous versions of Jammy Straub's message #8109107 « 24 1.4 and 16-35 VR OFFICIAL! »
