wickerprints wrote:
Rather, what I call into question is the existence of some kind of nebulous quality that, if it truly exists, should be able to be expressed in precise terms.
Despite some measure of disagreement, it has been expressed in fairly precise terms. Just not in that thread. Those shots in that thread only illustrate a misunderstanding of what the 3D effect looks like, or should look like. Most of them are decidedly flat and \"un-3D\".
We may not completely agree on what causes 3D-effect over hear in the weird side of the forum, but most of us at least agree on what it looks like.
Nov 27, 2009 at 09:04 AM
Previous versions of cogitech's message #7824451 « 3D discussion in the canonforum »
