musclepics wrote: Sam N wrote:
It\'s mostly down to DOF, lighting, textures, and subject distance vs. background distance.
It actually doesn\'t have too much to do with the lens, though some would like to think that it does.
Don\'t buy in to all the hype.
I agree totally.
I totally disagree (regarding doesn\'t have much to do with lens).
I agree that other elements contribute to perspective, but without the lens\' ability to resolve the gradient changes as the light \'wraps\' around its subjects ... you\'ll NEVER get it. Does it have to be Zeiss lens, certainly not, but it must have the ability to resolve minute variance (forgive the technically challenged).
musclepics wrote: Sam N wrote:
It\'s mostly down to DOF, lighting, textures, and subject distance vs. background distance.
It actually doesn\'t have too much to do with the lens, though some would like to think that it does.
Don\'t buy in to all the hype.
I agree totally.
I totally disagree (regarding doesn\'t have much to do with lens).
I agree that other elements contribute to perspective, but without the lens\' ability to resolve the gradient changes as the light \'wraps\' around its subjects ... you\'ll NEVER get it. Does it have to be Zeiss lens, certainly not, but it must have the ability to resolve minute variance (forgive the technically challenged).
musclepics wrote: Sam N wrote:
It\'s mostly down to DOF, lighting, textures, and subject distance vs. background distance.
It actually doesn\'t have too much to do with the lens, though some would like to think that it does.
Don\'t buy in to all the hype.
I agree totally.
I totally disagree (regarding doesn\'t have much to do with lens).
I agree that other elements contribute to perspective, but without the lens\' ability to resolve the gradient changes as the light \'wraps\' around its subjects ... you\'ll NEVER get it. Does it have to be Zeiss lens, certainly not, but it must have the ability to resolve minute variance (forgive the technically challenged).
Nov 10, 2009 at 08:57 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #7756240 « what is '3d' ? »