jeremy_clay wrote:
Aside from the fact that problems at low-ISO without pushing the files are present (see the night shot noise on page 3 of the \'show us your shots the 5DII wrecked thread) The point many on the \"Pro-5DII\" side don\'t talk about is the fact that a regular 5D, the camera the 5DII was supposed to improve upon, is so much more flexible to be pushed in post without pattern noise. If they could do it before, why not now?
Because a sensor with larger pixels will almost always provide more latitude in the RAW image than a sensor with smaller pixels. This is one reason why there\'s still a market for cameras like the 10D, 1D Mark 1 and the original 1Ds (one of the sharpest of most detailed of all the Canon sensors to date). This is why the Nikon D700 provides more latitude than the D300 (same resolution; one camera is full frame with large pixels, the other is crop camera with smaller pixels).
Except for the above and the significantly higher resolution of the 5D II, whatever other reasons why the 5D II doesn\'t allow as much \"push\" as 5D images aren\'t known to me.
- Steve
Nov 05, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Previous versions of veroman's message #7735905 « 5D2 Dynamic Range »
