Discussions about the basic look of film vs digital continue on FM. Some people argue that the grain in film is what makes it superior to digital. Meanwhile, digital camera makers seem to be determined to remove any grain at all. At the same time, Adobe and third-party vendors develop products that let you add the grain to digital image during post. I have a theory that much of the predisposition toward one or the other is age-related. So, answer this question...
All else being equal (photographer\'s skill,lighting, composition, subject, etc) which do you prefer, the look of a well done film image or a well done digital image?
Remember, this is based on looks alone...the workflow is irrelevant to this question.
Oct 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Previous versions of nathanlake's message #7696454 « The look of film vs digital »
