philber, yes that\'s a good test of CA, but not for LoCA. (we probably do really need two tests; on for CA and one for LoCA).
Yes, it would be difficult to standardize on that target, unless we all lived near that church. Even \"similar\" church columns under \"similar\" conditions wouldn\'t quite be accurate enough, I would think.
I guess the point would be to reduce the number of variable factors, in a way that would be easy for us all to replicate reliably.
philber, yes that\'s a good test of CA, but not for LoCA. (we probably do really need two tests; on for CA and one for LoCA).
It would also be difficult to standardize on that target, unless we all lived near that church. Even \"similar\" church columns under \"similar\" conditions wouldn\'t quite be accurate enough, I would think.
I guess the point would be to reduce the number of variable factors, in a way that would be easy for us all to replicate reliably.
Sep 21, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Previous versions of cogitech's message #7553484 « The perfect CA target? »
