Anybody know how the bokeh of the 135L and 200 f/2 IS (wide open) - wide open at the same framing (on FF)?
The reach (focal length) is not important to me, since I can move around. However, bokeh (background seperation) is important for my location portraiture.
I own and use the 135L primarily for headshots. The 200 f/2 IS is #1 on my wishlist for some time now. But if there is little difference between the quality/quantity of the bokeh between the 135L and 200 f/2 IS when both lenses are used at the same framing, I am not so sure anymore. You can almost buy 5 x 135L for the price of one 200 f/2 IS... if you catch my drift
Thoughts?
Aug 24, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Previous versions of Daan B's message #7448721 « 135L vs 200 f/2 IS bokeh »
