Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Hosting

My posts · My subscriptions
Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
  Previous versions of pilles's message #7269515 « Stone bed (nude) »
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
As far as you needing helpful comments, perhaps you are having difficulty interpretting my comments. for instance, when I say its flat lighting, you mean you don't know what that means and what to do about it? I means it needs shadows and modeling. There, does that make you feel better?
Jul 08, 2009 at 06:06 AM
pilles
Offline
[ X ]
Re: Stone bed (nude)


Y_vdm wrote:
pilles wrote:
Y_vdm wrote:
M on the stone bed

There doesn't seem to be any redeeming reason for the pic. It's just a nude woman on a rock, in flat daylight. The whole thing could have been done with a pinhole camera.

Thanks for your reactions Pilles. However as I admit the double critic on the concept and realization, I don't understand why a pinhole camera should be a negative comment. I never said that I'm using pro-camera and/or lenses and if a pinhole camera can help me to create bette pictures, I will use a pinhole camera.

The redeeming reason is because I'm not yet able to "feel" if a pic works or not and I expect critics and advices from other fellows on the forum. If you advice is to avoid negative spaces or to not redeem, it doesn't help me so much . Other members answered with short or long critics, and really negatives ones on this pictures, it helped me, and Muriel, to raise our skills and knowledge.

Finally, as I read and appreciate all critics from members on "impressions" or "works or not", I always give a look to members website and own pictures when the critics are about technical issues.

Hey, that's one of the nicest answers I've had here. Congratulations on your restraint. Most people here like to spout off and most of it is pretty juvenile.
Jul 06, 2009 at 12:48 AM

  Previous versions of pilles's message #7269515 « Stone bed (nude) »