Well, the items I\'ve read said Navy, but you\'d think they\'d develop a longer lens than 180 for the high seas. Tanks seem more like it, but I\'ve never read that till you mentioned it. I think some were saying the lens would have cost a bit more had research for it not been subsidized by military spending.
Jul 03, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Previous versions of erichard's message #7263202 « 180mm 2.8 ... choices are ??? »
