RGS65 wrote:
Because I don\'t find it a great combo on crowded city streets. I have one and I love it, I just never bring it to NYC.
aaronlam wrote: RGS65 wrote:
You don\'t need the 70-200.
Wide fast lenses, and maybe a fast 50 and 85 is all you need. Maybe a 135.
Why would you say you wouldn\'t need the a 70-200?
I agree... not so good for crowded streets but good for a lot of other situations... It is one heavy cumbersome sucker but I love the shots out of it...
a few from a trip to Chicago I just got back from:
RGS65 wrote:
Because I don\'t find it a great combo on crowded city streets. I have one and I love it, I just never bring it to NYC.
aaronlam wrote: RGS65 wrote:
You don\'t need the 70-200.
Wide fast lenses, and maybe a fast 50 and 85 is all you need. Maybe a 135.
Why would you say you wouldn\'t need the a 70-200?
I agree... not so good for crowded streets but good for a lot of other situations... It is one heavy cumbersome sucker but I love the shots out of it...
a few from a trip to Chicago I just got back from:
1DIII w/ 70-200L IS
Nov 03, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Previous versions of aaronlam's message #6343812 « help packing for new york. »
