Re: “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
But this discussion is not about noise or other IQ factors. Ultimately there is no good comparison across all factors, due to differences in sensors. For example, an OM-D shooting a 25/1.4 can easily shoot with less noise than a NEX, for example, due to its IBIS. System differences are much too complex to equalize. Equivalency is relatively simple in comparison.
Back to my point: for the purposes of exposure and holding the camera stably, an MFT 35-100/2.8 and a FF 70-200/2.8 are equivalent.
Feb 03, 2013 at 05:25 AM
Previous versions of carstenw's message #11320611 « “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter »
