This is what I mean with larger distances. I estimate the distance to the branches in focus to at least 7 meters, maybe more.
And a 100% crop. Mind you, this was shot at 1/20 handheld at ISO 6400 and pushed a bit in PP, so sharpness is of course what it is. But look at the background blur.
Yes, there is a fair amount of LCA and/or fringing, but the bokeh is still smoooooooth! I don\'t think I\'ve ever seen that from a fast 35 mm lens unless focus is quite close.
Edit: And there are no \"sharp corners\" due to curvature of field and/or mechanical vignetting like with the C/Y 35/1.4.
This is what I mean with larger distances. I estimate the distance to the branches in focus to at least 7 meters, maybe more.
And a 100% crop. Mind you, this was shot at 1/20 handheld at ISO 6400 and pushed a bit in PP, so sharpness is of course what it is. But look at the background blur.
Yes, there is a fair amount of LCA and/or fringing, but the bokeh is still smoooooooth! I don\'t think I\'ve ever seen that from a fast 35 mm lens unless focus is quite close.
Jan 23, 2013 at 03:29 PM
Previous versions of Makten's message #11293632 « RX1 bokeh vs other cams/lens at F/2.0 »
