fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #11284873 « 70-200f4L, is IS worth an additional $ 500.00? »
  

gdanmitchell
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 70-200f4L, is IS worth an additional $ 500.00?


Sven Jeppesen wrote:
The IS lens is a sharper lens even if you don\'t use the IS. There are more differences than just the IS between those two lenses

I have both lenses and I do not find that to be true at all. Basically, both of them are very sharp lenses.

Dan


Jan 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM





  Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #11284873 « 70-200f4L, is IS worth an additional $ 500.00? »