Re: New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera?
While I agree the lighting is flat. I think the skin tones are preferable to the other 2 samples of of Odeirmo and Panetta (too orange and too red). But then again, it could just be that those Jpegs were improperly saved or convert with the wrong color profile.
Edit: I found a better copy of the older portrait. I think the older portrait actually has better lighting and tones:
[url]http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2009/0109_obama-portrait/images/obama_portrait1.jpg[/url]
Re: New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera?
While I agree the lighting is flat. I think the skin tones are preferable to the other 2 samples of of Odeirmo and Panetta (too orange and too red). But then again, it could just be that those Jpegs were improperly saved or convert with the wrong color profile.
Edit: I found a better copy of the older portrait. I think the older portrait actually has better lighting and tones:
Re: New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera?
While I agree the lighting is flat. I think the skin tones are preferable to the other 2 samples of of Odeirmo and Panetta (too orange and too red). But then again, it could just be that those Jpegs were improperly saved or convert with the wrong color profile.
Re: New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera?
While I agree the lighting is flat. I think the skin tones are preferable to the prior portraits (too orange and too red), or to the other 2 samples of of Odeirmo and Panetta. But then again, it could just be that those Jpegs were improperly saved or convert with the wrong color profile.
Re: New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera?
While I agree the lighting is flat. I think the skin tones are preferable to the prior portraits (too orange and too red), or to the other 2 samples of of Odeirmo and Panetta.
Jan 19, 2013 at 12:40 AM
Previous versions of Jabberwockt's message #11281541 « New Obama White House portrait... guess what camera? »
