Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

My posts · My subscriptions
  

  Previous versions of cputeq's message #11237240 « Jump on this 24-105L deal? »

  

cputeq
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Jump on this 24-105L deal?


Gochugogi wrote:
cputeq wrote:
70-200 versatile? I dunno about that. I'd hardly call a 2.85x zoom "versatile."

Great for events, portraits and compressed landscapes? Sure I'll give you that, but I'm not sure many people would consider it a "walk-around", whether crop or FF body.


Then again, you gotta realize a LOT of photography is purely subjective. Maybe some people really do like walking around with a long, incredibly conspicuous white lens hanging off their camera as a walk-around - I guess if the bulk/weight didn't bother you, and you took a lot of event-like shots, portraits, and compressed landscapes, it would be perfect .

Me, I'd probably use something like a 24-105, which seems much more of a walk-around solution IMO, whether crop or FF body.


I use an EF 70-200 4L IS USM as a walk around very frequently on my 5D2. It's actually a small lens and only a wee bit longer than my 24-105L, but a lot smaller in diameter. The 24-105 is 670g whereas the 70-200 is 760g, so I can barely feel the difference in weight. My 70-200 is not white but, instead, is somewhere between light gray and off-white. I often shoot in dense urban locations--Honolulu waterfront and harbor--and nobody gives me a second look and it is certainly not more conspicuous than my 24-105 with hood.


Noted, which is why I typed what I did - you're apparently one of those photographers Also, I realize the f/4 is lighter/smaller than the 2.8, which may or may not be the version specified by the OP?


I would also venture to say it really depends on where you're shooting as to whether a certain combo looks conspicuous.

Take for instance your location vs mine. You're in dense, urban Honolulu -- frankly, a generally touristy area and certainly one having plenty of photographers. Meaning, more than likely, the people are accustomed to see white (or light grey or off-white or whatever color one choose to call) Canon lenses.

Now consider where I currently live - Shreveport, LA. Yes, there are a lot of movies shot here, and while we're not exactly a 3rd-world type of location, seeing a large camera and white lens walk around is extremely attention-getting. When I shot with my DSLR / 70-200 combo, people made it a point to move out of my way all the time because they thought I was either on a pro shoot or with the news...then they'd start looking for what I could have been possibly interested in with such a huge rig, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.





Jan 03, 2013 at 03:59 AM



  Previous versions of cputeq's message #11237240 « Jump on this 24-105L deal? »