Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

My posts · My subscriptions
  

  Previous versions of taylorman22's message #11237219 « non-IS 70-200 f/4L better than Tamron 70-300 VC? »

  

taylorman22
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Tamron 70-300 VC vs Canon 70-200 f/4L


I've narrowed down my zoom options to either the Tamron 70-300 or the Canon 70-200 f/4L. The Tamron is a few hundred less used and has IS and more range. So, I'm just curious from your Canon users how important the IS at this range. I used to own a 55-250 but never used it, but my needs have changed. I'll mostly be using it for landscapes, some wildlife, and my kids at the park/backyard, etc. I probably won't be doing much low light or stuff at night...possibly some landscapes at night, but on a tripod.


Jan 05, 2013 at 02:59 PM
taylorman22
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
How important is IS on the 70-200?


I've narrowed down my zoom options to either the Tamron 70-300 or the Canon 70-200 f/4L. The Tamron is a few hundred less used and has IS and more range. So, I'm just curious from your Canon users how important the IS at this range. I used to own a 55-250 but never used it, but my needs have changed. I'll mostly be using it for landscapes, some wildlife, and my kids at the park/backyard, etc. I probably won't be doing much low light or stuff at night...possibly some landscapes at night, but on a tripod.


Jan 03, 2013 at 03:51 AM



  Previous versions of taylorman22's message #11237219 « non-IS 70-200 f/4L better than Tamron 70-300 VC? »