Home · Register · Search · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

	My posts · My subscriptions
	Previous versions of taylorman22's message #11237219 « non-IS 70-200 f/4L better than Tamron 70-300 VC? »

taylorman22 Offline Upload & Sell: Off Tamron 70-300 VC vs Canon 70-200 f/4L I've narrowed down my zoom options to either the Tamron 70-300 or the Canon 70-200 f/4L. The Tamron is a few hundred less used and has IS and more range. So, I'm just curious from your Canon users how important the IS at this range. I used to own a 55-250 but never used it, but my needs have changed. I'll mostly be using it for landscapes, some wildlife, and my kids at the park/backyard, etc. I probably won't be doing much low light or stuff at night...possibly some landscapes at night, but on a tripod. Jan 05, 2013 at 02:59 PM

taylorman22 Offline Upload & Sell: Off How important is IS on the 70-200? I've narrowed down my zoom options to either the Tamron 70-300 or the Canon 70-200 f/4L. The Tamron is a few hundred less used and has IS and more range. So, I'm just curious from your Canon users how important the IS at this range. I used to own a 55-250 but never used it, but my needs have changed. I'll mostly be using it for landscapes, some wildlife, and my kids at the park/backyard, etc. I probably won't be doing much low light or stuff at night...possibly some landscapes at night, but on a tripod. Jan 03, 2013 at 03:51 AM

	Previous versions of taylorman22's message #11237219 « non-IS 70-200 f/4L better than Tamron 70-300 VC? »