fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
RustyBug
's message
#11191128
« Must landscapes meet a higher standard? »
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: Must landscapes meet a higher standard?
ben egbert wrote
:
The fundamental unanswered question in this thread is if there is a place for any less than perfect skill/artistic level.
ABSOLUTELY, MOST EMPHATICALLY ... YES !!!
Can a person just show their stuff even though it is not at the level of art?
ABSOLUTELY, MOST EMPHATICALLY ... YES !!!
I may never get invited up to the porch with the \"Big Dogs\" ... but I still like to run.
Dec 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Previous versions of
RustyBug
's message
#11191128
« Must landscapes meet a higher standard? »