Monito wrote:
The step effect at multiples of 160 is real (better dynamic range and less noise, except for the 5D c), but matters only marginally. However, I will take every little bit of quality I can eke out of whatever camera/film/sensor/lens combination I have in my hands at the time.
I\'d actually go so far as to rephrase your point in a way that is more accurate in terms of real world photography, as differentiated from test-bench theoretical discussions: \"The step effect at multiples of 160 can be measured but is invisible in photographs.\"
Take care,
Dan
Dec 06, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #11170490 « ISO sweet spots »
