JEFFERY Z71 wrote:
I do not think the 70-200 2.8 II is going to get you where you want to be. Mark IV and a 300 2.8 version 1 with extenders is a good starting point if you are both light and focal length limited. A full frame is only going to make you wish you could get closer.
+ 100
Nov 27, 2012 at 04:28 PM
Previous versions of Ralph Conway's message #11148636 « 5D Mark III vs. 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II.... »
