PetKal Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Re: new cameras differentiated on variables other than IQ | |
mttran wrote:
^^^ This is what i am talking about, Peter. Until then no more new bodies for me
I understand that, Michael. Even at ISO 1600, 1DMkIIN and 1DsMkII files can be fairly good, although they would require a fairly aggressive NR and pp, depending on the file enlargement and exposure. However, in the ISO range 100-400, I find that 1DsMkII files are at least as good as 1DX files.
Naturally, as ISO gets to be higher, 1DX creams 1DsMkII fairly early.
Here is an example shot with 1DsMkII (JPG...large), done at ISO 1600, \"Neat image\" NR applied, and about 30% crop enlargement.
|