Hmm, interesting. It\'s news to me that higher ISO gains than base produce less noise. While I haven\'t tested this directly and exhaustively it\'s contrary to all of my ancillary findings - on µ4/3 bodies.
I\'ll have to prove it to myself in order to believe this. Yeah, yeah, I know, stubborn Doubting-Thomas me.
Most of the stacking I\'ve tried and that I\'ve seen on-line that produced any decent results were exposures of between 5min. and 40min. Usually 5 or 10 min. exposures with 20 to 40 exposures total. And of course all these require tracking!
Hmm, interesting. It\'s news to me that higher ISO gains than base produce less noise. While I haven\'t tested this directly and exhaustively it\'s contrary to all of my ancillary findings - on µ4/3 bodies.
I\'ll have to prove it to myself in order to believe this. Yeah, yeah, I know, stubborn Doubting-Thomas me.
Most of the stacking I\'ve tried and that I\'ve seen on-line that produced any decent results were exposures of between 5min. and 40min. Usually 5 or 10 min. exposures with 20 to 40 exposures total. And of course all these require tracking!
Hmm, interesting. It\'s news to me that higher ISO gains than base produce less noise. While I haven\'t tested this directly and exhaustively it\'s contrary to all of my ancillary findings - on µ4/3 bodies.
I\'ll have to prove it to myself in order to believe this. Yeah, yeah, I know, stubborn Doubting-Thomas me.
Most of the stacking I\'ve tried and that I\'ve seen on-line that produced any decent results were exposures of between 5min. and 40min. Usually 5 or 10 min. exposures with 20 to 40 exposures total.
Hmm, interesting. It\'s news to me that higher ISO gains than base produce less noise. While I haven\'t tested this directly and exhaustively it\'s contrary to all of my ancillary findings - on µ4/3 bodies.
I\'ll have to prove it to myself in order to believe this. Yeah, yeah, I know, stubborn Doubting-Thomas me.
