The actual situation brings me to a question I would like to find an answer for.
In the past we (Canonians) got offered what we asked for. +/- a couple of things. But we bought, what Canon offered and so often complained about what the gear does not have.
We are in 2012 now and globalism works for us in few cases, but never before man had such a power to be heard. Canon and Nikon are companies that are very successful. Because of us. Here. Today. Should it not be the time, where we ask for what is possible and they should deliver it? They are nothing without all of us.So my question is easy. Why not merging them to what WE need?
I am a single man. Like me there are millions outside. You are one of them.
Why not asking both of them and maybe Sony for a photographic all around gear, that fits our needs and makes (all of) them money?
What I wish:
A camera that has an superb AF, eye controlled, best IQ at any resolution from 21 up to 36million pixels,
6-8 FPS (would be enough for 95% of us imo), light, astounding safe (against water and dust), a great design for shooting all around at an affordable price (about 1200 $). They can cripple whatever they want for their consumer lines. And add whatever for \"pros\".
Lets just collect how many of us would purchase it.
What do you (YES, YOU!) think?
Feb 08, 2012 at 01:41 PM
Previous versions of Ralph Conway's message #10324364 « Why not us? »
