fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
mptnest
's message
#10205307
« 500 f/4 IS age vs. image quality »
mptnest
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
500 f/4 IS age vs. image quality
do you have proof about your 100-400 statement or is that more internet hype?
For example, some claim...
this thread is not intended to \"stir the pot\", but thank you for joining us.
BTW, Happy New Year!!!
Dec 30, 2011 at 11:44 PM
Previous versions of
mptnest
's message
#10205307
« 500 f/4 IS age vs. image quality »