I suppose that kind of a question is related to one\'s desire to have both lenses, yet at the moment he/she is prepared to acquire only one of them. Clearly, both lenses are excellent in their own right, and it is hard to choose.
However, if we were following the lens focal length (FL) consideration alone, I could save a goodly amount of money by getting 28-300L, and then selling the following FL redundant lenses :
35L
50 f/1.2
50 f/1.0
85L
100L
100 SF
135L
180L
200 f/2.8
200 f/1.8
200 f/2 IS
300 f/4 non-IS
300 f/2.8 IS
28-80L
70-200 f/2.8 IS MkII
Dec 17, 2011 at 01:20 PM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #10174389 « 85L 1.2 II or 70-200L 2.8 II? »
: