Subjectively ... but I relate to objective concepts.
Sometimes it is without the benefit of objective empirical evidence ... which is why it must remain subjective until otherwise substantiated. Doubtful that we\'ll ever see the math from the design engineers to know if holds true or not ... but it\'s how I correlate ... i.e. Sick Puppy. Probably more like X^1.3 vs. X^1.6 vs. X^1.9 ... just to illustrate that the transition curve is different, not actually a formulaic fact. Probably should be interpreted as \"more\" linear vs. \"more\" logrithmic.
NOTE: The \'normal\' world should stick with \"roundness\", etc.
Dec 12, 2011 at 08:53 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #10161909 « Lens "Roundness" or "Volume"? »
