I have both, and use the f:1,8 much more than L; but I have to agree about (strong) backlight issues with the non L; I also hate CA at full aperture; but even L is not perfect: focus fringing is really annoying, and AF boring slow.
ultrapix wrote:
AF boring slow.
85/1,8 definitely wins for Q/P.
AF speed is relative.
Unless you want to capture action or demand instant focus I don't understand what the negative fuss is about.
If price were the qualifier a lot of L's would end up second place.
The f/1.8 is a normal short tele, the f/1.2 is not.
But if you want to cut back on cost the f/1.8 goes a long (I'd prefer a 135L, but if i couldn't afford that one I'd be happy with the f/1.8 fringing and all).
I've owned both. Waiting for the Sigma f/1.4 to release, I think that will actually be the happy medium for me. The f/1.2 was awesome and ALL of my shots were keepers in one form or fashion--either for my personal portfolio or for my clients, etc. The f/1.8 is great and does what it says, but...just can't shake that nagging feeling. And the purple fringe is annoying, yes. It's rare, but it is annoying.
