fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       4       end
  

Archive 2010 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35

  
 
Andre Labonte
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I'm a DX shooter and the only fast prime I need is 50mm. So "NO" on both. But I am glad to see Nikon offer these lenses. It really fleshes out the linup. Still a few other things to update, but holes are getting smaller all the time.


Feb 09, 2010 at 04:06 PM
ISO1600
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I emailed B&H about getting on a list for the zoom.


I never thought my 3000th post would be about buying a zoom lens.



Feb 09, 2010 at 04:08 PM
euua
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


dont see the point of getting them


16-35 make some sense to get and have if you dont have UW lens.
24 is just crazy price and just why ? nothing wrong with 24 f2.8 IMO





Feb 09, 2010 at 04:17 PM
NikonAndy
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I think the wife really wants the 24, but $2200 might be pushing it...


Feb 09, 2010 at 04:28 PM
gvg45
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


No 24 for me. I'll wait for the 35 f/1.4, if/when there is one...

The 16-35 very much interests me but I'll be waiting to read the reviews and possibly wait for a price drop.



Feb 09, 2010 at 04:30 PM
phatnev
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


Can't wait to get my hands on a 24mm 1.4. I love the whole idea of it. My Sigma 28mm 1.8 isn't reliable enough with focus, and I'm sure the Nikon will be built better and have purdier bokeh.


Feb 09, 2010 at 04:55 PM
jolahern
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


The zoom depends on two things, first is the optical performance vs the 14-24mm, second is if Lee filters come out it's filter holder soon, and how much it and the filters will cost.
If the 16-35mm is so so against the 14-24mm, and Lee come out with their filter kit, then I'll stick with the 14-24mm. If the 16-35mm is a star performer, and either Lee does not come out with the holder, or it costs an arm and a leg, then I sell the 14-24mm and get the new zoom.

The 24mm f/1.4 is for later down the line, would go well with the 85mm f/.1.4 I have as a low light kit or for the subject isolation you get. Will wait for the tests and price to go down.



Feb 09, 2010 at 05:07 PM
andrewd01
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


The 14-24 has been on my list for a while, but if the 16-35 can deliver similar performance at a significantly better price then count me in! For the 24mm lens I think I would go for the T/S before the 1.4


Feb 09, 2010 at 05:27 PM
fusiongt
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I just got into FX and the 16-35 sounds like the lens for me!


Feb 09, 2010 at 05:27 PM
hjanssen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I'm happy with my Sigma 15-30.


Feb 09, 2010 at 06:22 PM
sam962
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #11 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


very interested in the 24 , just waiting for the first reviews


Feb 09, 2010 at 06:34 PM
yukselserdar
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35



Those who intend to buy the 24mm, would be nice to know whether your on dx or fx.

Im curious, dont you find 24mm to wide on fx for general use?



Feb 09, 2010 at 06:43 PM
sam962
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


for me d90 for now , and trusty f5&f100


Feb 09, 2010 at 06:50 PM
gvg45
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


yukselserdar wrote:
Those who intend to buy the 24mm, would be nice to know whether your on dx or fx.

Im curious, dont you find 24mm to wide on fx for general use?


For my uses, yes 24mm is too wide to spend $2000+ on a lens. 35mm on the other hand...



Feb 09, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Steve Perry
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I'm planning on getting a 16-35 and testing it against my 14-24. If it looks on par in the F8-14 range where I usually shoot, I think I'll sell the 14-24 (although, it is HARD to sell sharp glass like that).

MTFs make it look good in the center, but those corners might be cause for concern. Guess it all depends on how it sharpens up after F8.



Feb 09, 2010 at 07:01 PM
passthegravy
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #16 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


Definitely a 16-35 when used ones start showing up.

No way I can rationalize or justify a 24 1.4, although I can still dream. Just like the 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8 and the 200-400 I want but will likely never own.



Feb 09, 2010 at 07:09 PM
Phyl
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


2.8 is what is wrong with a 24 2.8. That's EVERYTHING to me! For those wondering where the line starts, it starts HERE! And I'm in it.


Feb 09, 2010 at 08:45 PM
simonella_viru
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #18 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


waiting for the price of the 24/1.4 to drop significantly
or till the 35/1.4 comes out a good price
or till hell freezes over- whichever comes first



Feb 09, 2010 at 09:06 PM
mfletch
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


I'll get the 24, even though I really wish it were a 35. If I'm not totally blown away, I won't be keeping it long. And, by this, I mean, I expect it to shine above the 24-70, to stay. I'm curious to see how it performs wide open in respect to saggital coma flare. It seems to be a bit porky for a prime at 620g. Small size and light weight are one of the primary benefits of primes.


Feb 09, 2010 at 10:07 PM
luminosity
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #20 · Are you Buying 24 and/or 16-35


euua wrote:
dont see the point of getting them

16-35 make some sense to get and have if you dont have UW lens.
24 is just crazy price and just why ? nothing wrong with 24 f2.8 IMO



The 24/2.8 is ancient, mediocre and relatively slow.



Feb 09, 2010 at 10:17 PM
1              3       4       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       4       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account