rscheffler Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #14 · Canon 500mm - Carry-on case? | |
I hope you don't have to gate check it...
saaketham wrote:
hsk06 wrote:Kinesis Long Lens Cases
Is that carry-on size?
duffguy808 wrote: The Lowepro Photo Trekker AW II is a really big bag.
That's what I was afraid of too. I love that it can hold the 500 with the body attached, making it easier to carry just that bag and a smaller bag with a backup body and a couple of everyday shooting lenses. It's probably not carry-on size for smaller airplanes then. Gate-checking a 500 in that bag is equivalent to lens suicide. 
godfather wrote: A few months ago I was coming back from FL and the plane was at capacity. ..... When I returned I ordered a pelican 1510 w/dividers so next time I will be ready if a gate check is necessary.
Is the Pelican 1510 carry-on-sized in bigger planes? And is it sturdy enough to pass the test with uncaring baggage handlers in the event it has to be gate-checked? If so, I might get this as well as the Lowepro Trekker 600. That way, when I travel, I can use the Pelican, stuffing the trekker bag in my checked-in bag. And when I am actually out shooting or hiking, I'll use the trekker and have the convenience of the lens and camera already attached in the bag for easy and faster shooting.
For air travel nowadays, the 1510 is the most versatile option (IMO of course) for peace of mind. I wouldn't want to gate check any soft sided bag, but have gate checked the 1510 numerous times with long glass (400 2.8). To answer the question above, yes, the 1510 is carry-on sized for most aircraft. Definitely not a problem in larger planes. It's definitely OK in the overheads of the Embraer 170/175 planes coming online with US Air and probably other airlines. It will also fit the overhead of the CRJ 700, though it is a very precise fit that requires a bit of force to get the case out again. The downside to the 1510 is it's not ideal if you're traveling off the paved path by foot.
Ron
|