400 mm DO IS

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
end

Archive 2009 · 400 mm DO IS

Cloudybay
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #1 · 400 mm DO IS

I have just purchased a new 400mm DO IS lens and love it. The IQ is much better than my 100 - 400 mm IS lens which is what I would have expected. One question I have however is that is there a screw on filter for the front of the lens as a protector for the lens, there appears to be a front thread but I cannot find any information about this

Nov 22, 2009 at 08:17 AM

jaclarkaus
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #2 · 400 mm DO IS

It already has a protector on it - that's what the front piece of glass is.

Filters are inserted in the back (either gel or drop-in polariser)

Great lens - the one you want to carry!

Nov 22, 2009 at 08:44 AM

Cloudybay
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #3 · 400 mm DO IS

Thanks, that is reassuring but not readily obvious from the literature or specs, I was aware of the drop in filters

Nov 22, 2009 at 08:50 AM

stanj
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #4 · 400 mm DO IS

Always use the hood. The lens is fairly low contrast to begin with, and it really, really needs the protection from the hood to maintain the contrast that it has. But it's awesome.

Nov 22, 2009 at 05:02 PM

willis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #5 · 400 mm DO IS

Love mine, agree about the hood.

Nov 22, 2009 at 06:22 PM

Joe Winn
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #6 · 400 mm DO IS

I agree about the 400 DO. I had a chance to use one for a couple weeks and it was really great. The problem I have...and it's because I shoot 99% sports...is that it doesn't have a focus pre-set ring. Kind of important for me

I use my 300 2.8 all the time...probably about as sharp as the DO with a 1.4tc on the 300. But the DO is a smaller package than the 300 2.8.

Nov 23, 2009 at 01:17 AM

MDHO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #7 · 400 mm DO IS

Love my400mm DO as well. Never understood why some are reluctant to recommend it. I have the 300mm f/2.8, 500mm f/4 and the 800mm f/5.6. The lens that travel with me most is the DO. Only complain is the stupid lens cover on all the Canon's big lenses. Thanks to Don Zeck, that problem is solved with his ingenious invention.

http://MichaelDanielHo.com

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:10 PM

jerrykur
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #8 · 400 mm DO IS

Would anyone have a comparison between the 400 DO and the 100-400 (a good copy)?

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:15 PM

thedigitalbean
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #9 · 400 mm DO IS

jerrykur wrote:
Would anyone have a comparison between the 400 DO and the 100-400 (a good copy)?

I have both. My copy of the 100-400 is stunningly sharp (almost as sharp as the 500) and sharpness wise both are on par, the 400 DO however has less contrast than the 100-400. Given how good the IQ of my 100-400 is, I've debated selling the 400 DO, but many times that extra stop of light is very useful (both for getting higher shutter speeds and for better AF performance).

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:18 PM

MDHO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #10 · 400 mm DO IS

In my opinion, 400mm DO and 100-400mm f/5.6 are both 'soft' at their maximun aperture. With the 1.4 extender, DO beats the 100-400mm. With 2.0 extender, DO images are still useable under good lighting condition. One should expect the DO to beat the 100-400mm. After all, it costs almost 4 times more.

http://MichaelDanielHo.com

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:22 PM

AGeoJO
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #11 · 400 mm DO IS

I also noticed the DO's lack of punch (read: contrast) but it can easily be adjusted during the PP. I already traded my DO lens and I cannot compare that with my100-400mm side-by-side but from my recollection though, a good copy of the 100-400mm will give the DO a run for its money. In that respect, I agree with Aravind (thedigitalbean).

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:31 PM

troy12n
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #12 · 400 mm DO IS

For the cost, I never understood why someone would buy this over the 400/2.8L unless they really needed the light weight and that was the primary reason for purchase.

Nov 23, 2009 at 05:43 PM

stanj
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #13 · 400 mm DO IS

troy12n wrote:
For the cost, I never understood why someone would buy this over the 400/2.8L unless they really needed the light weight and that was the primary reason for purchase.

Well, there you just answered your own question

Nov 23, 2009 at 06:52 PM

AJSJones
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #14 · 400 mm DO IS

Nov 23, 2009 at 07:13 PM


FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell end