I'm considering a switch from my Canon FF over to a Nikon D700. My problem is that I have absolutely no knowledge on the Nikon lens lineup. Is there a site that lists all the different generations of Nikon lenses?
It seems that nikon shooters tend to use more zooms rather than the primes. Is there a reason for that? Poor quality primes in the Nikon lineup?
In my Canon setup, I started to lean towards the primes rather than the Canon zooms. I shoot mostly weddings and e-sessions at the moment. My favorite canon lenses are the 45 TS and the 50 mm 1.2. Wdo you guys suggest that I should start with in the Nikon lineup?
In my opinion Nikon has some excellent primes however they are all dated. Because of this many of their zooms can outshine them for various reasons. I would say that in some cases Nikon's zooms can outshine Canon's primes.
If you are getting a D700 I would recommend the 14-24, 24-70, 70-200mm VRII and an 85mm 1.4. It is probably all you will ever need. Every lens in the package is amazingly sharp.
nikon also has a 45 tilt shift, but it is expensive. as for the 50, there is the new 50 1.4G as well as the sigma 50 1.4, which i hear is really good. in fact my friend just replace his canon 50 1.2L with the sigma 50 1.4 bythom.com that louis listed has reviewed both the nikon and sigma 50 1.4s. there is also the 85 1.4. what else do you have in your kit that you need a nikon equivalent for?
dionysis wrote:
In my opinion Nikon has some excellent primes however they are all dated. Because of this many of their zooms can outshine them for various reasons. I would say that in some cases Nikon's zooms can outshine Canon's primes.
If you are getting a D700 I would recommend the 14-24, 24-70, 70-200mm VRII and an 85mm 1.4. It is probably all you will ever need. Every lens in the package is amazingly sharp.
The nikon 45 ts and any of the 50 1.4 variants would be good if you have to have a 50 1.2 you can get that new from Nikon still or find a used version but is mf only.
My 50 1.4d is a great lens, it's all i need in that department.
shameless 50 1.4 plug
Nov 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Andre Labonte Offline • • • • • • Upload & Sell: Off
My wedding setup is D3, D700 24-70/2.8, 70-200/2.8VR (version II in a week ), SB900 and SB800
This covers 95% of my shots.
Other 5% of the shots are with17-35/2.8, 15FE, 50/1.4G and 105/2.8VR Micro
I tried the 85/1.4, 105/2.0DC and 135/2.0DC but sold them. They are amazing lenses but with weddings flexibility is more important for me.
The 14-24 is the best WA solution on the market, but it's too much a speciality lens for me so I sold than one as well (I still have regrets).
I have no experience with TS lenses.
dionysis wrote:
If you are getting a D700 I would recommend the 14-24, 24-70, 70-200mm VRII and an 85mm 1.4.
And I'd recommend you NOT to get those lenses, if you're not keen on carrying more than what you need. Let's listen to the OP:
bishopj100 wrote:
In my Canon setup, I started to lean towards the primes rather than the Canon zooms.
There are many nice primes for Nikon too, but some of the shorter AF ones are "outdated". If you're not afraid of manual focus, there's numerous primes that are stellar, for very little money.
If AF is required, get a Sigma 50/1.4 to start with. Or the 50/1.4 AF-S, if you like the traditional behaviour from a 50 mm lens.
For the 50, I went for the f1.4G and I love it. But check out the reviews as several people have expressed disappointment. Personally I think it is superb.
If you prefer primes with Canon, I would imagine you'll prefer the same with Nikon. I think this is an area of frustration (for me anyway) as Canon has a bigger primes line-up in the 28-150 range of focal lengths, and a lot of the existing nikon line-up are reportedly no better than the f2.8 zoom range. But the 85 f1.4 is a gem, and the 60 and the 105 macro lenses are great too.
Check you'll be happy with our wideangle options. The 14-24 f2.8 is excellent - if you don't mind the big heavyweight zoom. But prime gems are trickier to come by unless you are happy to MF. I wish Nikon did a 35L equivalent, but they only do one in MF, or the 35/2.
Why did that thread get locked? It looked to be a good thread that people wanted to have stickied to the top. I was actually hoping to bump it.
Andre
Andre, I have no idea. But since this forum is so biased towards Canon in general, I figured they would just rather lock that thread and hope it disappears into the archives. I don't know how you make a thread into a sticky, as you can see, the mod clearly did not listen to requests from various people. Oh well, I got the direct link saved so I can send it on to people when I feel its appropriate.
I think I'll think hard next time before I waste my time like that though.
Nov 21, 2009 at 02:43 PM
Andre Labonte Offline • • • • • • Upload & Sell: Off
Avi B wrote:
Andre, I have no idea. But since this forum is so biased towards Canon in general, I figured they would just rather lock that thread and hope it disappears into the archives. I don't know how you make a thread into a sticky, as you can see, the mod clearly did not listen to requests from various people. Oh well, I got the direct link saved so I can send it on to people when I feel its appropriate.
I think I'll think hard next time before I waste my time like that though.
I think that would be a mistake. It's people who post like yours that make this forum worth coming to.
Thanks for the link. I am surprised though that he didn't rate the Nikon 70-300 VR higher. My experience with it, along w/ many other FM'ers, is that it is a well built stellar lens.
Please, give the OP a fighting chance of getting good information.
), SB900 and SB800