chez Online Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #7 · Photo calendar pricing | |
joebee wrote:
chez wrote:
AndyKellett wrote:
If I went into a large supply business and asked for one pound/kilogram of product X they would likely give me a price. But if I went back and asked for 1,000 pounds/kilograms of product X, I'd expect a different price. Ask any supply purchasing professional in a business about volume pricing -- photography is similar in that respect.
Best,
AndyK
Not really. Economy of scale comes into play with your example. There are manufacturing, production and shipping costs savings when you order items in bulk. There is no such savings supplying 1 photo, no matter how many calendars that photos appears on.
Feel free to sell your photos royalty free. That's much closer to the pricing model you are talking about. Rights managed is the model being discussed. Many large companies are using a third model - Corporate Image Libraries.
Calender photos are almost always a RM photo. The calendar co. wants exclusive use of the image for 2011 calendars and may want multiyear exclusives for calendars. Would you sell an ad photo to Macdonalds for a nationwide print campaign at the same rate as a local retailer with one location for use in a 5000 run weekly newspaper for a year? Usage matters, exclusivity matters.
Joe
I understand the differences between the different model. What I was wondering out loud about is if this type of model exists in other industries. For example, since you are a pro...maybe you should pay say $20,000 for your camera since you'll be using it to generate income while a hobbyist pay something like $500 for the same model since they will just use it for fun. Is this not the same as sort of differentiating between a Macdonalds add and a 5000 run weekly newspaper?
|