Dpic_arctic Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #4 · Upgrade body or Upgrade Lens? | |
Dpic_arctic wrote:
Definitely the glass is what makes a difference. Once you have lots of good glass, then you can think about upgrading the body.
Lars Johnsson wrote:
Definitely the body. When your camera is that old and have been upgraded four times, then it's time. If waiting until having lots of good glass, it mean waiting ten more years for most people
Ok, let me clarify. I still think that the glass is important. But if you can get a camera upgrade (40D is my recommendation), and still have the bugdet to get a good lens, then great- do that! But if this is going to be a major purchase (your only purchase for a long time), then I still will recommend a good L lens. I have seen many fantastic photos taken by the 10D. If you're really needing to use higher ISOs, then I would focus on a body upgrade. But if you want better color/sharpness/contrast more than lower noise, then it's the lens. Hope that helped.
matthewm wrote:
I've been seriously shooting since I was 18. So about 7 years or so. For the first 3 years of that, I had a bootleg copy of Photoshop 6. I used a Minolta DiMage Z1 for a year and a half of that and got great results with no training in Photoshop and just my photography background from school.
Funny this comes up here, I'm still running a copy of Photoshop 6.0. Don't remember if it's "bootlegged" or not. I bought a version, and made a copy, cant remember if this was it...Coupled with DPP/Zoombrowser and NoiseNinja, Photoshop 6.0 does what I need it to. A couple extra steps, but I'm working with what I have until I have the "UNLIMITED" budget (wife's blessing) to go Hog Wild...
I'm still running elements 3! I think I've mostly maximized the potential out of it.
|