MagicNikon Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
StefanosL. wrote:
I have most of my experience with this lens with my D300.
I think that if the had a third option to the focus switch (strictly for macro) things would be better.
I also don't like the fact that from a certain distance and below it's a f3.5 and not a 2.8.
I've read & understand why this is happening, but still it feels like i did not buy a "true" 2.8 lens. I feel a bit "cheated" by Nikon.
It is a wonderful lens no doubt, but it could be better at these things. (I believe at least...)
Also agree with you here, because I had been using it ona D300 previously. For head and shoulder length shots, yes it's 'wide open' at 3.2-3.5 unfortunately. Dont know how much difference it realyl makes, but it is bothersome. I got a taste of a 135mm f/2 recently, and I could really see myself adding the 105mm f/2 version (I didnt love the 135 FL).
It does have its own character, and probably why I will always have one. Thanks for looking and for commenting.
|