sskoutas Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #12 · Curious... why no master 1DIV thread? | |
32067dlm wrote:
sskoutas wrote:
...it doesn't seem to be so much a Mark IV as it does a Mark III b.
In your mind what would qualify as a Mark IV? Let's see, the announced Mark IV has a totally new focus system, a new LCD, a new sensor, and two of the latest Digic chips. It also has HD video to include 24p. I'm sorry if this camera doesn't meet your criteria, but if you'd like to see an incremental upgrade look back to the 1DII vs 1DIIn or the 20D vs 30D. Oh yeah, those were the days when Canon was the DSLR leader.
Now, if it will produce quality images without ghosts or plaid patterns...
regarding "meeting my criteria" I thought I said I'd love to own one. I'm not knocking this body at all... I just think that from a performance perspective, it isn't a huge leap ahead of the Mark III. The AF was necessary... do you really think they would ship a new body with "the same AF as the Mark III?" The sensor bumps up the MPs again... no shocker there and, in my world, no great gain. New chips? Yay! What's it doing except bringing the burst rate down slightly from 30 RAW to 28 RAW (yes, larger files).
From a functional standpoint, this is a Mark III with fixes and video added to bring it up to par with 2009 DSLRs.
That said, it still looks to me like a wonderful body, and I repeat, I hope this camera kicks serious butt both at retail level and in the field.
|