RRRoger Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.2 #4 · Do you travel with the 14-24 & 24-70? | |
rubberband wrote:
millsart wrote:
What its a question of is can you still enjoy yourself with such gear, and also is the point of the trip even to enjoy yourself or not ?
I think you hit the important point here.
If I'm going to get paid for a shoot, I want the very best with me, too bad about the weight. If I'm on vacation though, not so much. Sure, a full DX kit of a 10-20/17-55/70-200, tripod and macro lens will produce awesome shots for me, but carrying just a single body, 18-200vr and 10-20 means after an 8 hour hike I'm jumping out of bed the next morning to do it again.
If you have to look at the pictures you took to remember a hike, you were carrying too much weight. 
I agree, that is why I take my travel camera on long hikes: D90 with 18-200 lense.
Interesting side note: when I take a camera on a hike, I have to stop walking and thus appreciate the scenery much more.
There are also two other factors. 1. I cannot afford to loose my D3 work cameras on an unpaid trip. 2. Professional gear attracts thieves and panhandlers.
I will have to rethink this when I get my D700x or D800. The 14-24 will definetly be paired with the 24mp camera and I expect the increased picture quality will justify the extra weight.
|