Mike Mohrmann Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
thedigitalbean wrote:
Mike Mohrmann wrote:
mttran wrote:
1d4: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34462613
Flawed test. Any comparison that doesn't begin with images having the same FOV from all cameras is pretty much meaningless. 1D4 or D3s? I wish I could afford both and the lenses that would be needed. Both are stellar cameras with somewhat different strengths.
No, thats a reasonable test if one wishes to see which camera will produce better images for the reach limited shooter. In that context, yes the 1D4 will likely produce better images all the way to ISO 6400. Beyond that, the noise levels will start to seriously impact detail in which case the 'reach' advantage of the 1D4 will likely be negated.
And if you aren't reach limited? Like I said, this is based on a particular viewpoint. It would be interesting to compare up to a certain focal length, say 300mm, without cropping either camera. You can get into the "bang for buck" argument about costlier lenses for the larger sensors, but that issue has always been the case.
All that said, I like the APS-H sensor. Wished it were available in a 7D body. Canon isn't going to do that.
|