Canon don't put a 50/1.4 on their new adds, they put a red ringed lens on the front. And if the new body is coinciding with a new lens, That whole combo is shown.
Looks different to me look under the ES-1 Logo looks like mic holes to me Mark III doesn't have that also just about the battery the ergonomics look different sort of a bulge out
not saying some one couldn't have photoshoped this but who knows
The pics are just food for thought.
Familiar as in photoshoped, or familiar as in "canonīs general all purpose product angle and lighting". Could easily be either.
Hm, interesting... there are definitely subtle differences to be seen. Spot the differences, anyone?
The finger indentation looks a little different, but could be just the shadows.
There are the three little holes under the EOS-1 logo - mic?
There is a bulge near the lower port cover, both on the front and back of the body.
The prism and hotshoe area look a little different. Again, could be just shadows.
There is a slight silver area (cover for something?) just above the upper port cover towards the back of the camera.
The vertical shutter release looks slightly different; the angle looks changed somewhat.
The port covers look a little wider. Just.
The bottom port cover appears to have more lettering, and in two rows.
Looks like a new picture (different lighting, etc...)
Everything on it makes sense (mic, wider port cover to accommodate HDMI, etc...)
And the give away:
The random indent on the bottom right of the camera next to the port cover. No one would think to randomly Photoshop that in. Gotta be the real deal.
The two images look like two different camera angles and clearly portray different lighting among other nuances...not to say you can't PS that, but it would take quite a bit of work.
As a pro-video shooter of 720 60p, I would be happy to see it shoot 24p. I guess it would be fine for Mythbusters, but otherwise, it can be a bit jarring.
