mdude85 Offline Image Upload: On
|
p.1 #7 · Question on Pic usage | |
Well -- just my personal opinion, but getting any kind of royalties for the use of your photo is probably out of the question by now, and even if it was possible, would probably be more trouble than it's worth.
At first glance it seems like the researcher you worked with took your photo without consent and supplied it with the articles he wrote at UCSD -- then the photo was submitted to the journal Nature (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7088/pdf/4401117a.pdf) and subsequently published, including a photo credit to you. The photo also appeared in a number of other journals (just do a search for your last name in the major science journals or on Google). It's a little unclear how the photo managed to get licensed to the AP from UCSD, other than being supplied for free or for a licensing fee, or perhaps, AP has a contract with major universities to license their photos for distribution (not uncommon).
My guess is that UCSD never inquired about the source of the photo when it began distributing. The paper trail on this issue is indeed very complicated. Perhaps you should contact the person you worked with at Chicago and at least explain to him or her that the photo was not intended to be distributed to such a wide audience.
You also need to make sure that your other photos do not end up being used by wire agencies. For instance, I see you have a few photos of another bird (a finch?) online. Apparently that photo was supplied to the PLOS (Public Library of Science), which distributes all its content including photos under the CC attribution license (any kind of distribution of copyrighted material is OK as long as the original author was attributed). If that is OK with you, then OK. If not, you should get that photo removed before it ends up on another newspaper website.
|