Zach_Eberl Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #19 · Vertical Pano of a 300yo Redwood | |
Has anyone actually read the article in Nat. Geo.?
runner301- The fold out in Nat. Geo is 8.5" X 28.5". Out of camera, one image cannot do that.
To everyone else-one of the last articles in Nat. Geo. is Inside Geographic, explains how they photographed the redwood.
"'The world is going to wonder how we got that picture,' says Nick Nichols about the foldout photograph in this month's issue (a two-by-six-foot fine art print is now available for purchase at PrintsNGS.com). 'It was a total team effort.' After a year of talks and planning, photographer Nichols, National Geographic Senior Editor Ken Geiger, and several additional team members figured out how to shoot the massive, 1,500-year-old redwood: They tethered a rope between two trees and from it hung a pulley system carrying three cameras. As the cameras descended, Nichols-on the ground nearby-shot pictures remotely from a laptop computer. It took three weeks of predawn attempts, but finally, in one morning, they captured the 84 images that make up the foldout. After the shoot Geiger spent more than 120 hours digitally stitching them together to create what Nichols now lovingly 'the collaborative composite'" (National Geographic, October 2009, p.128)
Most people on this forum would thing three weeks trying to get the shot is way too long, but Nat. Geo. is a huge company, which has the money to do that. I really do not see why people are voicing their opinions without even knowing the background facts. That video is just an ad for the October Issue.
EDIT: As for the apparent trolls, I did not see what they wrote. Only the large amount of people commenting on the troll, and not the OP. I get some peoples frustration over them, but just leave a mod a PM or something next time.
|