Bmeister Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #24 · EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS master thread | |
EOS20 wrote:
I wouldn't be to quick to pass judgement on a lens you haven't even used! I've had the lens for a week now with my 7D, and it's not that bad really, sure it's not a "L" lens, but it is still very capable of producing some great photos paired up with the 7D.....
Excuse me, but I certainly have shot the 7D with both kit lenses you mention and I also shot the 7D with my 135/f2 (L lens if you're keeping score). My 135/f2 and 200/f1.8 can make acceptable use of the resolution on its crammed sensor, but the kit lenses in no way make use of the resolution offered by the 7D; they are a waste unless you have nothing else.
Getting a 7D and using their kit lenses does not utilize the full capabilities of the 7D unless, of course, you don't need the detail from its full resolution. That isn't to say the lenses won't make "acceptable" photos, but if the extra resolution is required, then I say pass on any of Canon's kit lenses ESPECIALLY for the 7D. The 7D is going to require the very best glass to get the most out of what the sensor offers unless you aren't as picky with detail rendering from a camera with that much potential resolution.
The only reason I can see to get a 7D with a kit lens short of a 24-105L (and even that wonderful lens may fall short on the 7D...I'll have to try that) would be if you want the HD video or are replacing a worn out 50D or older xxD body or just don't care about how much detail that you miss when using inferior glass. To add to my pontificating, I don't see a vast AF improvement worth the price of the 7D either as it approaches used 1dmkIII pricing. Looking at things through my pro glass eyes and with consideration to the value of the package, it falls short, IMHO.
|