khiromu Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
p.1 #12 · any advice from canon convert? | |
Tobin28 wrote:
The thing that you have to get use to most is that your images will be in focus. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA j/k (Kind of)
Very true!! 
I have also converted from Canon. I used from 10D to 40D and 1D, 1DII, and 5D.
The first thing I noticed was that Nikon focuses right. I converted to D700 from 5D (well, actually I went to Leica M and then to Nikon). Also, Nikon consumer level lenses are much sharper than Canon. For example, 70-300VR is super, old 28-105D is very good as well. There is not much clear separation between consumer and pro level except for the built quality.
If Canon had D300 or D700 class bodies, then I might have stayed with them, but 50D line is not built like D300, and 5D is not D700... Canon needed a small 1D or 1Ds to match D300/700.
The only weak point of Nikon is the lack of fast primes such as 24/1.4, 35/1.4, 50/1.2 (AF), 85/1.2 (with USM focus), or 135/2 or 200/2.8 with fast focus motor. But then, if those nice lenses do not focus well on consumer bodies, you can not use ultra thin DOF...
For zoom lenses, I like Nikon better. 24-70 is super, and so is 14-24 (I sold it in favor of 10-24, though). I have had 24-70L and 16-35 II L. I don't have any experience with 70-200, but 70-300 is much better than Canon counterpart. Nikon may be missing F4 line, but then, 28-105 and 70-300 are very good if you can live with variable aperture...
Anyway, I am overall very happy with Nikon.
Hope this helps.
Hiromu
Edited on May 21, 2009 at 05:42 PM · View previous versions
|