Apologies for the uninspiring pic, just had to try it on the first thing around. Doesn't do justice to the lens, hopefully Sakura/Hanami will fix that in Tokyo.
Not everybody is OK with a lens not focusing to infinity ... Mine focuses up to ~10m or so because I choose to keep the same lens configuration as in the FD setup. It might be possible to adjust for infinity focus (i.e. Rokkor method), I just don't know how yet.
Best is to do it yourself (not really difficult and very self rewarding); if I have time I will post a how-to.
I'd love to see a proper comparison between this lens (FD 85 1.2 SSC or 'L') and either the EF 85 1.2L or maybe EF 85 1.2L II.
I had the FD 85 1.2 SSC and EF 85 1.2L and found no real optical difference between them but I never did compare them directly in a methodical way and I suspect this is the only way to show up minor differences.
I suppose I'm questioning if there is really any point in doing the conversion other than possibly saving some money. I don't mean to be critical, just qurious.
JohnJ wrote:
I suppose I'm questioning if there is really any point in doing the conversion other than possibly saving some money. I don't mean to be critical, just qurious.
JJ
Since it is a time consuming conversion, this is a very valid question. My motivation was:
Weight: EF = 1,025g (2.3lb) ; FD = 680g (1.5lb)
Compactness: EF = 84mm ; FD = 71mm
Manual Focus of FD is great
Cost: EF ~$1,000 / $1,500 ; FD = $300 for an E+ copy
You've mentioned that the conversion isn't difficult but still a lot of work and a time consuming process. What part of the process has been the most difficult? The most time consuming?
I wasn't as lucky as you, so I purchased my 85/1.2 SSC a bit on the high side. As a result, I want to make certain that I understand the conversion process thoroughly lest my ineptitude destroy the lens.
I haven't seen any fd 85/1.2's go for $300. Not saying there haven't been any, but it seems as though the going price is a little higher. If I am wrong please point me in the direction of some $300 FD 85L's, I want one.
Alt lens conversion is an idea I keep toying around with. I do currently have one FD lens and have considered and passed on others. This and the rokkors show the potential, I guess I'm still worried about the problems with clearances and focusing. What conversion kit did you use for your 85L? Any mirror problems?
hdan wrote:
You've mentioned that the conversion isn't difficult but still a lot of work and a time consuming process. What part of the process has been the most difficult? The most time consuming?
Most difficult: none really. I was just careful not to damage the rear element when resizing it and removing all the mechanical guts. Plastic/tape protection helped.
Most time consuming: figuring out how the aperture works, and measuring everything to keep the original FD configuration. Then, resizing rings/spacers with a file. I wanted to go slow to avoid big mistakes.
ewadler wrote:
I haven't seen any fd 85/1.2's go for $300. Not saying there haven't been any, but it seems as though the going price is a little higher. If I am wrong please point me in the direction of some $300 FD 85L's, I want one.
E-bay isn't always the best place to shop. I am lucky enough to live in Tokyo, so I go to fly market and used gear photo shops. $300 ~ $350 is quite common for a 85L.
dancam wrote:
Alt lens conversion is an idea I keep toying around with. I do currently have one FD lens and have considered and passed on others. This and the rokkors show the potential, I guess I'm still worried about the problems with clearances and focusing. What conversion kit did you use for your 85L? Any mirror problems?
This not a kit, this is pure DIY.
If you want infinity focus and original FD configuration, the rear element needs to be at 1.7mm above EF mount. Typically up to 1.2 ~ 1.5mm is OK before getting in Mirror issues. Mine is set at 0.7mm to avoid any problem. Next step is either to understand if we can adjust the lens infinity (a la Rokkor) or remove another 0.5mm to gain focus up to 15m.
JimBuchanan wrote:
That sounds about right. My EOS/FD50L rear element is at about 2mm above the EF mount, and is pretty much exactly placed in relation to the main lens assembly at infinity.
Here is where the 1.7mm comes from, given an EF mount total length at 6.67 mm, from mouth to ring base.
We want FD config, so according to the above diagram we want the rear element at 10.40mm "altitude" vs screw base. This gives:
- Screw base 0.00 mm
- Original spacer ring (after removing the little gouge) 2.00 mm
- EF mount total 6.67 mm
- Distance EF-RE X mm
- Rear Element 10.40 mm
