I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Nikon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums | Nikon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload

2 end

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #1 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

I did move from Canon to NIkon.... here's my take from an amateur point of view.

I originally bought Canon gear because the friend who got me into DSLR shot Canon, so he was a wealth of information for me coming from a point and shoot perspective.
I bought a 1D, then 20D, 30D, 1D2N, then back to a 1D.

I loved the Canon 85mm 1.2 version 1 that I had. I like it better than the 1.4 of Nikon, would like to see an AF-S version of the 85mm 1.4 as I haven't given up on that lens yet, it was more likely my inexperience.

I think I found a replacement in the Nikon camp for my former 80-200mm "drainpipe". I like both the AF-S version of the 80-200 in Nikon and the AF-D two ring version.

I'd like to someday try the 28-70 "beast" or newer 24-70mm 2.8, but for now my Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 is doing pretty well, it seems very sharp and since I don't shoot in that range often, I'll keep my funds for other purchases.

I think I found a replacement in the NIkon camp for my Canon 300mm 2.8 non-IS lens, it's the Nikon 300mm 2.8 AF-S version 1 lens. Love the Nikon version, it's a quick, and quiet focus.
I miss my Canon 200mm 2.8 prime version 1 with the built in hood, I have the Nikon 180mm 2.8 and if it had AF-S, I may think they were similar.

I think I found a replacement for the Canon 300mm f/4 non-IS lens...it was my NIkon 300mm f/4 AF-S lens. Unfortunately I sold it as it wasn't auto-focusing consistently, so I sold it at a loss in full disclosure and I'd like to buy another one some day.

I still own my Canon 1D and 300mm non-IS 2.8 lens, but those items may be sold at some future time.

A Nikon lens I'd like to try is the 14-24mm 2.8 lens even though I hardly shoot those focal lengths.

Lisa

Mar 30, 2009 at 03:39 PM

Alistair Watson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #2 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Lisa, so overall, are you happy with the move?

Mar 30, 2009 at 03:41 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #3 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Yes, I am. I didn't discuss Nikon bodies, but I shoot with a D90, D1H and D2H camera. The learning curve was easier for me with those cameras....just seemed more intuitive for me. I really love my D1H, I know it's old technology, but that camera is my go-to camera. If I was a pro, I'd probably buy a D700, D3 or D3x.

Lisa

Mar 30, 2009 at 03:45 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #4 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

I forgot to mention that the Nikon 200mm f/2 VR lens is a GEM! I had the Canon 200mm 1.8 and I prefer the Nikon, I unfortunately sold it to get some funds together, but I'd happily own one again.

Lisa

Mar 30, 2009 at 03:52 PM

Alistair Watson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #5 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Alistair Watson wrote:
Lisa, so overall, are you happy with the move?

lisantica wrote:
Yes, I am.
...

That's good to hear! I switched a month ago and so far I am very impressed and looking forward to the start of the season.

Mar 30, 2009 at 03:56 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #6 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

In Canon, I loved USM and in Nikon I wish more lenses were AF-S. I tend to like whisper quiet lenses.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:02 PM

Alistair Watson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #7 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

The only thing I really miss from the Canon 1D series is the lug on the underside of the body for the handstrap. I did look at a plate for the Nikons but don't really like that idea so I am learning to live without it.....

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:06 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #8 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

I hear ya on that! Brilliant design on the 1D having that accessible on the underside of the 1D.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:12 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #9 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Fat lady hasn't sang yet for me.....but she could be warming up

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:20 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #10 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Richard, I am such a literal person that I can't figure out if your post means I'm fat

or that Nikon gear is beginning to look good.

Lisa

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:23 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #11 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

It means that Nikon is slowly winning me over.....I would never call anyone fat.....but can you sing?

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:26 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #12 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Ahhh, just making sure

Being literal is difficult when reading posts.

Edited on Mar 30, 2009 at 04:29 PM · View previous versions

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:27 PM

AGeoJO
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #13 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Hi Lisa,
This is my take on the issue as I posted a portion of it on a different thread:

A lot of folks that have made the switch completely from Canon to Nikon or that never used Canon are definitely more enthusiastic about their gear and understandably so. However, folks that use both systems tend to be more subdued in their praises for Nikon, yours truly included. Don't get me wrong, there are absolutely features/lenses that I like in the Nikon system but I can say the same about the Canon system. Both are really excellent and I could be happy with either one but I have my feet firmly footed in both camps.

Just my opinion, of course

Joshua

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:28 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #14 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

AGeoJO wrote:
Hi Lisa,
This is my take on the issue as I posted a portion of it on a different thread:

A lot of folks that have made the switch completely from Canon to Nikon or that never used Canon are definitely more enthusiastic about their gear and understandably so. However, folks that use both systems tend to be more subdued in their praises for Nikon, yours truly included. Don't get me wrong, there are absolutely features/lenses that I like in the Nikon system but I can say the same about the Canon system. Both are really excellent and I could be happy with either one but I have my feet firmly footed in both camps.

Just my opinion, of course

Joshua

Some started life with Nikon and switched to Canon, now have switched back to Nikon. I started with Canon thirty years ago and have never used Nikon until the D3 I picked up last week. I am finding problems with the Nikon system, just as there are problems with Canon equipment. Nikon has the lead in some areas but lags behind in others. I'm am thinking Joshua is pretty much on target, if you look at the entire system neither is head and shoulders above the other.

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:38 PM

lisantica
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #15 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Most definitely Joshua and Richard. Both systems are excellent and my proof is in the fact that I can't seem to part with my last two Canon gear items.

I wonder if I had started with Nikon gear if I would have wanted to sample Canon gear too. I do know that I would not sell my current Nikon gear to go back, at least at this point, but merely because I've settled into some gear that I use, understand and enjoy the output.

Lisa

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:40 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #16 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Because of what I do, I am reluctant to run both systems. The differences between them cause me to pause and think about how to make a change. My hat is off to those smarter than I who are sucessful at the two camp solution. I will eventually stick with only one. For now the Nikon flash system, and the 200-400f4 are pulling me toward Nikon. I am waiting for my MKIII to return from it's second recall before I make my decision.

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 04:48 PM

thedigitalbean
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.1 #17 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Joshua

An opinion that I share completely

Running both systems however does imply a couple of things. If you are doing paid gigs the added expense of having backups for everything on both systems could be prohibitive. However if you're business is thriving the added expense should be that bad. If you are a hobbyist, dual systems can work out well if you can manage to switch between the cameras without issue. Last night I was shooting dancers on a dim stage with the 1Ds3 + 85L and the D700 + 24-70. I switched back and forth between the two cameras without a hiccup, but your mileage may vary.

I should add that the Nikon flash exposure system and metering system in general do rock and is one of the areas that folks have used superlatives to describe which has actually lived up to the hype.

Mar 30, 2009 at 05:21 PM

Alistair Watson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #18 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

mill4570 wrote:
.... and have never used Nikon until the D3 I picked up last week. I am finding problems with the Nikon system, just as there are problems with Canon equipment.

Richard, how are you finding the D3?

Mar 30, 2009 at 05:53 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #19 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Alistair,

It is taking a little getting use to. Lens mount is reversed, cards plug in facing away from the lcd display, exposure comp scale is reversed, and there is an "anti-flash confirmation" light

. The image quality is great, the flash system is much much better, and I got a chance to use a 200-400f4 this weekend and that may seal the deal. The only real complaint is the vignetting of the 70-200f2.8 on the FX body (a known issue). It is really bad. On the upside, the center of the lens is so good, I can use the 1.4 tc and maintain good image quality. Something I could not do with the Canon 70-200f2.8 and tc. The 24-70f2.8 is bright edge to edge, and on the FX is actually wide.

In short, I think I am going to move to Nikon. The issues I have with the system are small and will go away as I use the gear. Soon the Canon system will be backwards

.

My MKIII should be back from round two next week, I'll make a final decision then.

I was hoping to hear more from you and Lee about your experience. PM if you need to.

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 06:22 PM

Skyehigh
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #20 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Just my tuppence , I moved from Canon to D700 and will move back again as soon as new 1DS comes out .

Mar 30, 2009 at 06:49 PM

Alistair Watson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #21 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Richard, people have asked me various things in various threads so I never bothered creating a dedicated thread on my move, sorry.

Anyway, I am still taking every opportunity to get out and about with my kit, only 1 month to my busy season starts and I am still waiting for my 500/4 VR!

I have got used to the fact that everything is reversed and can insert a CF card in a hurry first time now!! My plan for this weekend is to use the Adobe DNG profiler to create a sunny profile for my D3 and D3x as so far I haven't been fully impressed with the colours out of ACR 5.3 yet and I am stubbornly avoiding NX2 because a) I refuse to pay for it given I have dropped c. £15K in Nikon UK's pocket b) I am lazy and already know Photoshop and have an established workflow for the high volume of images I work with and c) if NX2 is anything like DPP it won't be geared towards a high volume photographer so the previous points are moot.

The vignetting of the 70-200 VR hasn't really bothered me yet, really this is just a pit/close-up/candid lens for me and I will most likely crop for effect anyway.

Hope that helps for now.

Mar 30, 2009 at 07:55 PM

mill4570
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #22 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Alistair,

I have downloaded the 60 day demo of NX2, and it is pretty slick. I doesn't appear to make good use of computer resources because it is slow to update in edit mode after adjustment, and takes a while to batch process images. I agree completely about it's cost plus the cost of Nikon's Camera Control product. They should be bundled together for $60.00US.....what a rip. They are nice programs, but $350US wow!

Richard K.

Mar 30, 2009 at 08:18 PM

geniousc
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.1 #23 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

mill4570 wrote:
Alistair,

I have downloaded the 60 day demo of NX2, and it is pretty slick. I doesn't appear to make good use of computer resources because it is slow to update in edit mode after adjustment, and takes a while to batch process images. I agree completely about it's cost plus the cost of Nikon's Camera Control product. They should be bundled together for $60.00US.....what a rip. They are nice programs, but $350US wow!

Richard K.

Richard,

I'm not sure where you are getting the $360 usd from but take a look here.

http://nikonmall.com/detail/NIK+VSA59005

gene

Mar 30, 2009 at 09:51 PM

jon49erfan
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #24 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

He was saying Camera Control + NX2

Mar 30, 2009 at 10:02 PM

nikt
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #25 · I did move from Canon to Nikon mostly

Just a point on the NX2, it's being updated to 2.2 as has 'supposedly' better batch processing. We'll see how much better, but something current owners of the product will be interested in since it's a free upgrade for 2.0 users.

Mar 31, 2009 at 03:09 AM


FM Forums \| Nikon-mount SLRs \| Join Image Upload 1 2 end