orangefirefish Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Cute dog Scott- almost like a little snow bunny 
To the OP- I'm sort of in the same boat- I've used both systems extensively (I started out shooting NIkon film, and started digital with a D70, and then a D300, before getting some 1d's) and I have to say that despite the slower AF acquisition on the D700 and D3 (even a 40D seemed to snap into focus faster), the tracking focus on the D3/700/300 is very good. The Canon cameras have been really good for AF, especially the 1d2N, but the new D3 is really, really comparable too.
At this point I'm switching back to Nikon gear for sports and PJ use, but I'm probably going to keep my 5d2 for use with alt glass and video purposes. I'm hoping to get everything sorted out before March madness begins, so hunting for a 300 VR right now.
The 70-200 2.8 VR is a good lens, but I somehow always felt it wasn't as sharp in the corners as the Canon 2.8 IS. Maybe Nikon will release a newer version of the 70-200, so I'm going to stick to a AF-D 80-200 2.8 for the time being, especially since I don't need the VR for sports.
I think you'll be happy with the Nikon combo. The D3 is amazing, but the one camera I really like in the Nikon lineup is the D700, as it packs all the pro features into a small body, with weathersealing and pro build. This is what Canon should have released- but failed to do so.
|