Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Forum Rules
FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
1
   2   end
  

Archive 2009 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm
  
 
cogitech
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


To those of you who have owned and used both of these lenses.

How does the 35-70 compare to the 21 regarding sharpness, contrast, micro-contrast and colour?

Feb 14, 2009 at 04:11 PM
Toothwalker
Online
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


cogitech wrote:
To those of you who have owned and used both of these lenses.

How does the 35-70 compare to the 21 regarding sharpness, contrast, micro-contrast and colour?


That is an unusual comparison. But anyway, and although I have no experience with the
35-70, I find that the MTF reports published by Il Prode generally correspond well
with my CZ experience:

http://www.geocities.com/ilprode/TestZ.htm


Feb 14, 2009 at 04:49 PM
cogitech
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


I owned the CZ21 and loved these aspects of the lens. Not sure why it is unusual to wonder how the 35-70 compares...

(Thanks for the link. It has been a while since I viewed those results)

Feb 14, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Toothwalker
Online
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


cogitech wrote:
I owned the CZ21 and loved these aspects of the lens. Not sure why it is unusual to wonder how the 35-70 compares...


Different focal lengths, different applications, ... oh well. Maybe it is not unusual.

When you ask about 'colour', do you mean colour saturation or colour balance? The
former is just a manifestation of what is generally known as 'contrast', the latter is
unfortunately subject to sample-to-sample variations. That happens even within the
Contax Zeiss arsenal.









Feb 14, 2009 at 06:38 PM
StevenPA
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Paul, I have a good idea of the kind of info you're after here. Briefly, yes, the 35-70 will deliver the same "punch" that the 21 does, but not as quickly, and wide open performance leaves something to be desired. The 21 is great wide open and becomes awesome at f/4 (one click down), as you well know. The 35-70 needs a bit more stopping down: two clicks to f/5.6, which is very nice indeed, and I don't hesitate to use it. f/8 is amazingly sharp right down into the corners.

I wouldn't buy the lens if I planned to use it wide open routinely. The Leica 35-70/4 is much better suited for wide open work.

Feb 16, 2009 at 09:12 AM
edwardkaraa
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


I've never used the 21 but agree fully regarding the 35-70.

StevenPA wrote:
Paul, I have a good idea of the kind of info you're after here. Briefly, yes, the 35-70 will deliver the same "punch" that the 21 does, but not as quickly, and wide open performance leaves something to be desired. The 21 is great wide open and becomes awesome at f/4 (one click down), as you well know. The 35-70 needs a bit more stopping down: two clicks to f/5.6, which is very nice indeed, and I don't hesitate to use it. f/8 is amazingly sharp right down into the corners.

I wouldn't buy the lens if I planned to use it wide open routinely. The Leica 35-70/4 is much better suited for wide open work.



Feb 16, 2009 at 09:21 AM
weekh
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Just a remark on the bokeh.

The bokeh of the 21mm is UGLY !!! Nobody seems to mention this. Guess everyone wants great DOF.

The 35-70mm renders much pleasing bokeh than the 21mm.

Feb 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM
edwardkaraa
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Anyway, all what I've seen from this lens are landscapes at infinity at f/8-f/16. It doesn't seem to be used for artistic OOF close-ups.

Feb 16, 2009 at 01:04 PM
gerov
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Paul,
don't have the 21, but the bokeh on the 35-70 is beautiful. I believe the attached was shot at very close to wide open.



This image is copyrighted by the owner





Mar 17, 2009 at 03:02 AM
hubsand
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Steven nailed it pretty much: they mix sweetly in the same shoot: very similar drawing styles and colouring.

The CZ21 you know is flawless in terms of resolution, but is a little prone to internal reflection and doesn't handle flare as well as the Canon equivalents at the same focal length. And it has that gullwing distortion.

The CZ35-70 also has a distortion glitch: strong barrel at 35mm (gone by 40mm) but handles point light sources better. In the f5.6-11 range, at distance, the CZ35-70 outresolves any other Zeiss design it can be compared directly with. It's also very good close-up, but fractionally outperformed by the Zeiss 60 Makro. It does not suffer from long-end fade, either. The family resemblance to the CZ21 is strong.

Mar 17, 2009 at 01:48 PM
 



wayne seltzer
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Mark,

Do you have any sample pictures that show that the CZ 35-70 outresolves the Zeiss 35 ZF and 50 ZF Makro at distance in the f5.6 to f8 range?

Mar 17, 2009 at 09:14 PM
Andi Dietrich
Offline
Dedicated FM
Account Locked
p.1 #12 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


I found the 35-70 was not at it's best at 35mm and iffy to focus on a Canon. The makro is nice but it can not be directly compared to real macro lenses as it does not offer some important qualities of a typical close up lenses. For best close up performance a reverse ring can be recommended. I think it is a little overrated here but for the price this lens usualy goes it is still an amazing piece.

Mar 17, 2009 at 10:54 PM
edwardkaraa
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


I found my copy to be excellent at all focal lengths except at 70mm where it was still very good. It's sweet spot is around 40 to 50mm.

Mar 18, 2009 at 02:51 AM
adamM
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Another vote for the CZ 35-70

It seems to nearly outresolve the sensor.. on a 5DmII

This is at f/5.6, which is the lens's sweet-spot



This image is copyrighted by the owner




Here's a left side 100% crop with only minimal standard sharpening


This image is copyrighted by the owner




The lens is amazing.


Mar 18, 2009 at 06:03 AM
hubsand
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


wayne seltzer wrote:
Mark,

Do you have any sample pictures that show that the CZ 35-70 outresolves the Zeiss 35 ZF and 50 ZF Makro at distance in the f5.6 to f8 range?



It's a fair cop: I should have said that it's sharper than any other Contax lens of similar focal length. I've not compared the CZ35-70 with the ZF35 and 50, but that sounds like a interesting idea!

Mar 18, 2009 at 09:27 AM
Justin D
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Mark, Do you have any sample pictures that show that the CZ 35-70 outresolves the Zeiss 35 ZF and 50 ZF Makro at distance in the f5.6 to f8 range?
Actually, while I don't have any images off hand, I'd be so bold as to say that, in my experience, the 35-70 is sharper than the ZF35. Much more distortion, however.

Mar 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Lotusm50
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Justin D wrote:
Mark, Do you have any sample pictures that show that the CZ 35-70 outresolves the Zeiss 35 ZF and 50 ZF Makro at distance in the f5.6 to f8 range?
Actually, while I don't have any images off hand, I'd be so bold as to say that, in my experience, the 35-70 is sharper than the ZF35. Much more distortion, however.



I have both the ZF35 and the 35-70, and there isn't a chance that the 35-70 is sharper than the ZF35. Stopped down to around f8 (optimal for the 35-70 at 35mm) the zoom can probably get close, but the ZF35 reaches this level of performance by f4.0. Wide open up to f8, the ZF35 just dominates the old zoom, and has less light fall-off (almost a 2 stop difference).



Mar 18, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Chris VenHaus
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


I recently did some night work with the 21mm Distagon, and was disappointed with the amount of vignetting wide open. The 35-70 and Nikon 14-24 are my workhorses, and I think I'll move to the Canon 24mm mkII for night work. I think it will be better at f2.8 than the Zeiss.

Mar 18, 2009 at 01:12 PM
adamM
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


Lotusm50 wrote:
I have both the ZF35 and the 35-70, and there isn't a chance that the 35-70 is sharper than the ZF35. Stopped down to around f8 (optimal for the 35-70 at 35mm) the zoom can probably get close, but the ZF35 reaches this level of performance by f4.0. Wide open up to f8, the ZF35 just dominates the old zoom, and has less light fall-off (almost a 2 stop difference).



Published tests show the 35-70 to be sharpest at f5.6, at all focal lengths. My personal tests confirm this

http://www.geocities.com/ilprode/VarioS_35-70f34.htm



Mar 18, 2009 at 11:15 PM
Lotusm50
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #20 · Contax 21mm vs. Contax 35-70mm


adamM wrote:
Lotusm50 wrote:
I have both the ZF35 and the 35-70, and there isn't a chance that the 35-70 is sharper than the ZF35. Stopped down to around f8 (optimal for the 35-70 at 35mm) the zoom can probably get close, but the ZF35 reaches this level of performance by f4.0. Wide open up to f8, the ZF35 just dominates the old zoom, and has less light fall-off (almost a 2 stop difference).



Published tests show the 35-70 to be sharpest at f5.6, at all focal lengths. My personal tests confirm this

http://www.geocities.com/ilprode/VarioS_35-70f34.htm



My own tests indicate that the 35-70 needs f8 to get the corners. The "published" tests (not sure if merely putting them up on the web qualifies them to be considered "published") you refer to didn't measure the corners (just the "borders"). Overall, in my view and experience, it is best at f8.0, even if it is essentially the same in the center at f5.6. Regardless, the ZF35 has about a 2 stop advantage over the zoom.



Mar 18, 2009 at 11:40 PM
1
   2   end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1
   2   end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?