Evan Baines Online Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
Mattbtn wrote:
Personally, I don't buy into the perceived necessity that you HAVE to have an IPS panel to achieve great results. Does it make life easier? Sure, but not all of us have thousands of dollars to spend on monitors. The same way not all of us have thousands of dollars to spend on 1Ds or D3X cameras, all top quality lenses, and top notch lighting. You just have to find something you can work with and still achieve consistent, satisfactory results.
Can that consistency be achieved with a TN panel? You bet...without a doubt.
I've been using a 24" HP monitor for some time now (w2408h), and have never had a single issue. My Spyder3Pro keeps it in check, and I know which angles to view from to ensure accuracy. Of course, I read several articles and commentary that suggested I should NEVER use such a monitor for critical color work, but it's all garbage in my opinion as my results continue to prove those opinions incorrect.
Of course, that doesn't mean every panel will work, but I certainly found one that did. YMMV.

Amen, especially since I'm skeptical as to the ability of ANY back-lit screen, no matter how calibrated, to truly replicate the appearance of a printed paper.
Don't get me wrong: if you're doing serious volume and can't afford the time or effort to make test prints, then it totally might be cost effective to purchase a super-monitor. However, I suspect that for the kind of truly fantastic results for which one theoretically would buy such a monitor, ultimately print trials are the way to go.
For my budget, a calibrated Apple Cinema gets me close enough.
|