First Post - FM Forums

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
What are the criteria?

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Image Upload
end

First Post

TommyBonefish
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #1 · First Post

It is my first time so be gentle.
All feed back would be appreciated.
Thank you.

Exif information
Model	NIKON D200
Date	2005:10:29 14:54:52
Original date	2005:10:29 14:54:52
Exposure time	1/500 sec
Focal length	400mm
Focal number	f/10.0
ISO speed	320 ISO
Exposure compensation	0.0

Dec 09, 2008 at 06:09 AM

Kaden K.
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #2 · First Post

Beautiful. Welcome.

Dec 09, 2008 at 06:19 AM

Scott Stoness
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #3 · First Post

Welcome to the forum.

It is a nice shot, interesting with good background and the bird is large enough in the frame.

It would be better for me if it were framed down a bit and to the right so the bird is flying and looking into the empty space.

It is a bit soft to my eye. The rule of thumb is shutter >= 1/effective mm, 1/650 sports, or 1/100 stills. If you have IS and the photo is still you might get it down to 1/100 with 400mm. But in this case it is moving so >=1/650 would be needed for sharp. I would move up the ISO.

Nice picture.

Dec 09, 2008 at 02:18 PM

TommyBonefish
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #4 · First Post

Thanks for the input. You are right I did not take into account the "effective" mm. Is there a plug in that may help the sharpness?
Unfortunately to the right is the edge of the frame. Fast bird, could not keep up.

Dec 09, 2008 at 05:59 PM

sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #5 · First Post

Beautiful background with the softness nicely complementing the subject. Bird images really require backgrounds which are complementary and not competing with the subject. The alignment of the bird with the shore, wings over water make this especially appealing.
I think you could open up to f5.6 or possibly faster and have more room to shoot with a faster shutter speed. You probably could bump your ISO as well, as Scott S suggested.
Bird could be sharper and you might want to shoot closer to 1/1000s.
As Scott said, ideally the bird flies into the frame (flying into more open space, rather than exiting).
As far as sharpness, what do you use to process your images now? I shoot Canon, so I dont know what gets bundled with the Nikon cameras, but if there is a RAW processing enginie, should be some (nonselective) sharpening, at least.

Oh, and, belated Welcome to FM!

Scott (G)

Dec 10, 2008 at 12:22 AM

sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #6 · First Post

Sharpening plug-in thread in evolution on another forum:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/716141

Scott

Dec 10, 2008 at 12:44 AM

Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #7 · First Post

Very nice and welcome to the forum. I don't think I can add to Scott S and Scott G's comments.

If the original image is RAW and you don't have, you might download ViewNX (free) from Nikon's site. It will process the RAW file and allow you to extract the most possible from the image in post processing.

Also, again if you do not have, you can download Capture NX2 from Nikon's site which is a full featured processor especially for NEF files as well as jpgs and tiffs. I believe the demo is good for 30 days.

I've taken the liberty of playing a bit in NX2, if you object I'll remove the post. I tried to pull some detail out of the bird, don't know if that was accomplished or not...sometimes I tend to be a little heavy-handed with the contrast

Again, welcome

regards,

Bob

Dec 10, 2008 at 12:54 AM

TommyBonefish
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #8 · First Post

Thank you all for the welcome and taking it easy on me.
I appreciate every ones advise and will put it into practice on my next outing.
Bob, feel free to work on anything I post. That is what I am here for but thank you for offering. Another point of view is always welcome.
Again many thanks for all the replies.
Tommy

Dec 10, 2008 at 03:11 PM


FM Forums \| Photo Critique \| Join Image Upload end