Steady Hand Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
p.1 #9 · Your Impression #67 Etude | |
papageno wrote:
Interesting snap. Did you consider minimal hairlight for separation of head and top from background?
I have to admit I'm curious; did the artist like the picture?
Hello papageno. 
Thanks for adding your impression too.
I am glad you found it interesting.
You asked a good and valid question regarding a hairlight. I understand. 
I understand the use of hair lights but I do not like their use in most cases.
I think when hair lights are applied to a person, they seldom look natural.
My core preference is to see and make images or portraits that are very "natural" to the person and the situation or scene.
I understand the "reasons" they are often suggested, but I do not agree with the aesthetic results (in most cases).
For example, in my Pianist series (one shown here) there are images of the pianists made at two different locations (and different pianos). The light in the locations was of a different type and style and direction and source and number.
In one location, the look shows an "overhead" "hair light" look. This was because the pianist was sitting in a spotlight. So it appears "natural" for the venue/location/setting. But...I don't like the look on the hair. That does not mean I don't like the portrait/image or the "general" light on the person. I just accept that in THAT kind of lighting situation, I have to expect overhead artificial light to have an effect on how the hair appears. But, it is not my preference. 
In the other location, there is no "hair light" added to the natural light (natural sunlight coming through a large window). In those images the hair looks much more natural (to me) and much more pleasing (to me as an artist/painter).
I don't expect every photographer (or most) to share this opinion or POV. But, it is mine and one that has been considered for many years of careful observation of figures, forms, and faces (and hair). 
I will post a few more from this series here and it will probably be clear to a close observer which images were made in a light scenario that included artificial overhead (hair lights) and which used natural sunlight.
Is one better than another?
I really think that is a matter of taste. 
I hope that helps. 
Lastly, you asked if she liked the image.
Yes she did. We both liked it (so did her sister) and we both got a laugh from it too. You see, she is a very "sweet" young woman who is also very intense (at times) and this revealed a "look" that was totally natural to her, but seldom captured in a photograph. She was surprised by it, pleased, and amused too. I think it is one of her favorites. 
I have a question for you too. 
Where are you located (what city/state)?
I always like to know how these images (and the net) connect with people from different places. I am in Birmingham Alabama USA at this time.
|