Steady Hand Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #3 · Family | Michel-Couture | |
Jim Rickards wrote:
Some of these are quite well done, while others show some weaknesses.
#1 has lots of empty space on the bottom for no apparent reason.
#4 has such narrow DOF that important parts of the photo are OOF
#5 has narrow DOF that becomes distracting and areas are overexposed.
In the other shots you seem to have caught the essense of this happy family and protrayed them well. We see wonderful expressions, nice colour, good compositions and see them interacting as a family.
+1 
Plus a few more "personal opinions"....
1. Faces are always more interesting than photos of shoes. I would rather see "details" of a child's face instead of a simple (and easy) shot of some temporary and unimportant shoes. Mass marketed shoes are not unique. People are unique. Devote your focus on shoes, not on inanimate "details" that have no life. 
2. Look at image #1.
See the light on the face? Where is the light coming from? Most of the face is in a shadow. My Simple Suggestion: rotate the child so that more of the face is catching the ambient light so the front of the face is not in a shadow. "See the light."
3. Short DOF may seem very "cool" if properly done. IF improperly executed, it just looks like a lack of "focus" and lack of "skill" on the part of the photographer. OR, it appears like you don't know what to focus on. 
4. Very cute kid. Lucky parents. Loving couple. Lots of potential.
5. Image #8 would have been my favorite if most of the faces had been in focus. IF I were the mother of one of the parents, i wouild want to see both my own child and my grandchild BOTH in focus. IF I were one of the parents, I would want to see BOTH my spouse AND my child in focus. So easy to do, and so simple.
I hope these comments help and encourage you.
|