Rodolfo Paiz
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
|
Handheld or on tripod? Any flash used? Is this the 55-200 zoom lens?
I like the idea in the second... frog contemplating a jump to the outside world. The first is just a nice shot of the flower, needs a stronger composition. Either put more stuff in, or take stuff out, until the picture is telling us something specifically.
If possible, get more/better lighting. The colors are kind of flat and lack saturation... they feel pretty dull and lifeless. More light will mean better/more-vibrant greens and pinks in these shots. Even a single SB-800, held off-axis (say, with a bracket) and diffused (see LordV's coke-can diffuser in the Macro forum for an almost-free and very worthwhile solution) would do wonders for these shots. Also, as you improve the lighting you do want, take care with the lighting you don't want as well. The reflection of the light on the water in the first shot really needs to get eliminated, and you can only do that at the time you take the shot.
The flash would also help you use a lower ISO, since there's more noise in the shadows than I expect from a D60. Did you underexpose and have to bump up the exposure in post? If possible, try to expose a little further to the right (but don't blow the highlights) and then turn it down a bit in post. Much lower noise, and you can tick the black-point slider by a point or two to get richer blacks and better dynamic range while you're at it.
But in the end, all of that is secondary. In these two cases, the focus is nowhere near as sharp as it could be. The flower in particular has the water almost-in-focus (even that, not quite), but the flower itself is not sharp. Not the pink petals, and most especially not the center part (stamens?) which should be perfect since it's going to draw the viewer's attention. I'm sure it's not motion blur at 1/640, and you could probably use more DOF but for that you'd need more light. Just looks poorly focused to me. And that's critical.
Still, overall I think they're both good learning experiences. The first one should be a lesson in lighting, focus, DOF, and composition, then will not be a long-term "keeper". The second one has a lot of potential, just needs better execution (also in lighting and focus, mostly).
|
